Probability Duty Posted New Game Law All Amendments

All the game laws that include the legal Mandarin of probabilistic items in December last year were revised. All amendments have to open the hearing officer and converge their stakeholder opinions, and the hearing was scheduled to be held in December. But there was a variable here. On November 23, the revision of all one game law is inevitable. Since the simultaneously evaluated game method is all the amendments, you have to be a merge audit that combines two bills, and you have to make a schedule for related public hearing.

The amendment of the previously evaluated amendment, the Democratic Party of the Democratic Party, the new revised amendment this time was the representative of the nationalization of the nationalization. The largest feature of the new feet is that the game is not legally mandatory to disclose probability item probability information to the user. In addition, there is no domestic agency system to clear domestic user protection duty to overseas game companies. Overall, it is small to protect game users than existing amendments.

Typically, the new amendment has no obligation to reveal probability item probability information. In the ideal representative, it is specified that the probability item is defined and the probability item information to be provided to the user. However, there is no probability item related to the likelihood of probability items, and only the regulation of autonomy is included. In the application of use here, there is a more specifically specifically for regulatory support for 'induction of autonomous regulation of overseas game companies'.

If a source of use is passed, the probabilistic item problem is that the problem of the probabilistic item is due to the autonomous regulation of the Korean Games Industry Association, and the legal basis for which the alternative to the law will disappear. It also arises the basis for which governments can support the government regulatory participation in overseas games.

In addition, there is also a 'Domestic Agent System', which is a 'Domestic Agent System', which allows overseas game companies without branch offices to domestic law, but there is nothing in use. In the absence of the number of games such as the number of game users and sales, overseas game companies, such as sales, such as sales, should be designated as a 'domestic agent', and if domestic agents violate the law related to game users, The Korea Games Industry Association, which is included in the domestic agency system, which is included in a member of a strange man, will impose the effectiveness of a river to overseas operators who have been submitted to a member of the law of February this year. I pointed out.

About the schedule of the existing game law amendment that was originally scheduled for December, a complaint, said, Merge review (which combines two legislation), and the hearing should be held in two legislations. I have to determine the schedule of the hearing through the liver agreement, and now the schedule was not confirmed.